Issue
I want to add some features into Browser app by start an activity from another android application. It gives me package does not exist while I make the Main Project. Notice that I see the AndroidLib is built successfully into an out/target/product/generic/data/app/AndroidLib.apk
Here are two android.mk files: AndroidLib(a normal Android App)
LOCAL_PATH:= $(call my-dir)
include $(CLEAR_VARS)
LOCAL_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := \
google-ps \
android-support-v4 \
LOCAL_SRC_FILES := \
$(call all-java-files-under, src) \
LOCAL_MODULE := AndroidLib
LOCAL_PACKAGE_NAME := AndroidLib
LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS := tests
LOCAL_PREBUILT_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := google-ps:libs/google-play-services.jar
include $(BUILD_PACKAGE)
# additionally, build tests in sub-folders in a separate .apk
include $(call all-makefiles-under,$(LOCAL_PATH))
Browser App
LOCAL_PATH:= $(call my-dir)
include $(CLEAR_VARS)
LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS := optional
LOCAL_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := \
android-common \
guava \
android-support-v13 \
android-support-v4 \
LOCAL_SRC_FILES := \
$(call all-java-files-under, src) \
src/com/android/browser/EventLogTags.logtags
LOCAL_PACKAGE_NAME := Browser
LOCAL_PROGUARD_FLAG_FILES := proguard.flags
LOCAL_EMMA_COVERAGE_FILTER := *,-com.android.common.*
# We need the sound recorder for the Media Capture API.
LOCAL_REQUIRED_MODULES := SoundRecorder, AndroidLib
include $(BUILD_PACKAGE)
# additionally, build tests in sub-folders in a separate .apk
include $(call all-makefiles-under,$(LOCAL_PATH))
Then I do:
make -j Browser
It gives me:
packages/apps/Browser/src/com/android/browser/BrowserActivity.java:36: package com.om.AndroidLib does not exist
import com.om.AndroidLib.MainActivity;
Solution
Update
Essentially your problem is that the line:
LOCAL_REQUIRED_MODULES := SoundRecorder, AndroidLib
Tells the Android build that your Browser depends on AndroidLib being built first, however it will not be linked to AndroidLib in any way. To do that you need:
LOCAL_JAVA_LIBRARIES := AndroidLib
Except that requires the AndroidLib to be a java library project, using the build type:
include $(BUILD_JAVA_LIBRARY)
And java libraries cannot include resources, unfortunately. And there is no way to link one app to another app in the Android build system.
We are working around that issue frequently, and it is frankly a bit of a mess to do so. But the only workaround we have found is to include all the resources directly in the apps that use those resources. Sorry.
How to make your AndroidLib a java library and link to it
Your android lib should probably be built as a java library, and not as a app package. So instead of:
include $(BUILD_PACKAGE)
You should probably do:
include $(BUILD_JAVA_LIBRARY)
Then you lib will be placed in out/target/product/generic/system/framework/AndroidLib.jar along with the other system libs.
Also you do not need a LOCAL_MODULE_NAME for a lib, it is only applicable for an app. So strip that.
And you should probably consider changing your LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS to:
LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS := user
tests indicates that you lib should only be built for testing, user says to build you lib for all user builds (and implicitly also for engineering builds)
In you app Android.mk you should then add a line:
LOCAL_JAVA_LIBRARIES := AndroidLib
Such that your app will be built with AndroidLib in the classpath.
In you apps AndroidManifest.xml you also need to put a uses library in the application tag:
<uses-library android:name="AndroidLib" />
And last you need to create a permissions xml file, with the following content:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<permissions>
<library name="AndroidLib"
file="/system/framework/AndroidLib.jar"/>
</permissions>
And update your product configuration file such that the xml file will be deployed to target:
PRODUCT_COPY_FILES += device/XXX/libs/AndroidLib.xml:system/etc/permissions/AndroidLib.xml
Replace device/XXX/libs/ with the path to the permissions xml file.
This is how we add and use an Android library in our Android builds. I hope it helps. :)
Answered By - Bjarke Freund-Hansen
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.